Saturday, February 7, 2015
Rhythm and Timing
Master Mushahi [one of the greatest samurai of ancient Japan) speaks on
the same and differences of timing and rhythm. I think I understand much
of the differences. Rhythm is about flowing naturally, with your heart,
mind, body, soul, surroundings, to naturally flow in that zen state,
where you flow in the eternal mu of the tao of shunyata. Timing is the
correct action that needs to be taken place at the moment, in order to
have greater rhythm. The action or the no action. This restores harmony.
I have been practicing it, and it should be applied in everything we
do, as a way of life. A state of being. Bless it be everyone
Knife blocking
Very nice demonstrated from Grand Master Hatsumi, recent upholder and master of Ninjutsu Togakure-ryū Soke --
Knife defending is probably one of the most fundamental and essential aspects of ninjutsu. It is all a matter of "correct positioning, prior to correct moment" feeling your opponent, which isn't easily explained, especially by westerners. It is done through PSI psychic phenomenon, and empathy, gathering of energy, and intentions, which can be practiced in Sakkijutsu - the art of sensing intentions.
Knife defending is probably one of the most fundamental and essential aspects of ninjutsu. It is all a matter of "correct positioning, prior to correct moment" feeling your opponent, which isn't easily explained, especially by westerners. It is done through PSI psychic phenomenon, and empathy, gathering of energy, and intentions, which can be practiced in Sakkijutsu - the art of sensing intentions.
The other art is understanding the nature of distance. You must act and
don't act based on how you understand distance from your opponent, and
the moment it transpires. This is accomplished through understanding the
moment, and the wavelength of the force between the radius and feeling
it out. It isn't easily understood. Then positioning yourself, where you
need to be, in that area which is blind to your opponent, and you are
out of danger, on that instant. It is what many call - doing by looking
like you aren't doing anything at all - This is also based on reaction
timing. To move where you need to be at that moment, in that position in
time, then act. React/move where you need to, to disable, or control
the energy of the potential attacker, to shift the momentum in your
favor, then disable your opponent.
Knife fighting or knife defending is extremely dangerous, because it is close combat, and the weapon is very small, but deadly. You have to be experienced in the realms of proper distance, and feeling your opponent out, and being able to react at a moment end. It also takes swift and effective reaction speed.
Sincerely Krysta Ryu Mukoto Much Love <333
https://yadi.sk/i/P-uK7QiSdEfxT
Knife fighting or knife defending is extremely dangerous, because it is close combat, and the weapon is very small, but deadly. You have to be experienced in the realms of proper distance, and feeling your opponent out, and being able to react at a moment end. It also takes swift and effective reaction speed.
Sincerely Krysta Ryu Mukoto Much Love <333
https://yadi.sk/i/P-uK7QiSdEfxT
Google Search
The biggest problem with search engines (especially Google) is the
the way search queries give results, on false premises within
syllogisms. I see it all the time, and it is annoying. For instance, it
bases the quantities of results on the major premise, without
structuring the sequence of the entire syntax (search structure) to
consistent results. Instead it separates each statement (word) then
cross references them with random/ separate search results, in the terms
of major premise of the syntax, rather than the sequence of minor premise that you want.
I am guessing they do this due to getting more pages - quantity over
quality. It is lame though, and makes it extremely difficult to get what
you want, when you are using specific search queries to get a result on
specification. How lame is that? You might as well use a single term,
because it appears as if the query doesn't know how to use the
mathematical operation of AND ^ to connect or conjunct statements, for
specifications.
A lot of people hate Google search mainly due to this. They have the most advanced search engine, but it seems as if it is garbage. I search for This "major premise" + of that it belongs to in addition , and instead of understanding the statement as a whole, it separates both states as individuals, and gives random results based on individual statements.
This is extremely lame and embarrassing. If mathematics in the real world was used in such an unorthodox, and very lacking way, we have no real results, just a bunch of random chaos, and unorganized data.
If I worked at Google, I would set it straight, and make a more effective search engine, blind folded.
Simple example?
Google doesn't know how to get the result of 2 out of 1 + 1
It keeps giving you a series of 1, over and over again. It can't put together the entire syntax as a whole.
1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/
That is all that you get
They say that Google has such an advanced search engine, but that is a lie. Has to be. No induction or deduction could be so lacking and false.
A lot of people hate Google search mainly due to this. They have the most advanced search engine, but it seems as if it is garbage. I search for This "major premise" + of that it belongs to in addition , and instead of understanding the statement as a whole, it separates both states as individuals, and gives random results based on individual statements.
This is extremely lame and embarrassing. If mathematics in the real world was used in such an unorthodox, and very lacking way, we have no real results, just a bunch of random chaos, and unorganized data.
If I worked at Google, I would set it straight, and make a more effective search engine, blind folded.
Simple example?
Google doesn't know how to get the result of 2 out of 1 + 1
It keeps giving you a series of 1, over and over again. It can't put together the entire syntax as a whole.
1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/
That is all that you get
They say that Google has such an advanced search engine, but that is a lie. Has to be. No induction or deduction could be so lacking and false.
Unstable vs stable
The
greater the quantities- multiplied by the actions = greater
complications, greater result of chaos. It is not a matter of reducing
the quantities, but multiplying those quantities with the required sets,
to hold a number of quantities, so it can be found, at a moments
notice. This is the base of establishing a number of places to hold data
or stuff. This reduces the likeness of complications, and is the
foundation of organization.
FOR EACH data type -> there shall be a place holder of such quantities... in the region. Establishing multiple data types of such quantity. This reduces the act of complication, and disorganized data.
Of course many who are experienced in Programming/Informatics are well informed by such. After all, this is what OOP is, and its base revolves around Encapsulation. I am here to remind the importance of organization. It also fits into the realms of Entropy. Let us not reduce data, by set up the required regions to store data, that is structured. I hope everyone remembers this basis, when developing projects.
Thank You.
FOR EACH data type -> there shall be a place holder of such quantities... in the region. Establishing multiple data types of such quantity. This reduces the act of complication, and disorganized data.
Of course many who are experienced in Programming/Informatics are well informed by such. After all, this is what OOP is, and its base revolves around Encapsulation. I am here to remind the importance of organization. It also fits into the realms of Entropy. Let us not reduce data, by set up the required regions to store data, that is structured. I hope everyone remembers this basis, when developing projects.
Thank You.
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Intelligence
AND/OR/NOT
What exactly is intelligence? Is it putting ideas
to use, based on experience, and seeing the outcome? Or is it failing
time and and again; reducing the wholeness of our understanding, which
is filled with errors, until what we are improves as an result?
How would the main operators of logic be applied? AND is usually a conjunction operation, dealing with the consistency of multiple values, then getting a more consistent result. AND denoted by ^ is a minor premise tool, where it does reflect unity, but is still based on the idea of reduction, in regards to the opposing assertion.
Then there is OR which is based on the grounds of thorough examination, between this or that. It is like the buffer or between the choice, due to the situation. "Do ya like cheese Burgers" OR "Cheese Pizza" of course I can love cheese burgers, and Pizza, but that depends on the situation. Let say I was having too much citrate, so the pizza sauce could cause its adverse effects, but another time I was consuming too much grease, so burgers could cause some nausea. I guess it is all a matter of the timing, and my previous choices through the moment in time, and what choices I made that are still with me, this determines the correct OR operation. The OR is a choice based on the previous and current progress, and the moment in time, that determines the best result.
Then there is NOT - where is based on simplicity of negation logic -] "the value is whatever the opposite results in" "If he is that good, he is not that bad" The value is determined by what it is not, in opposition. True only when the opposite is false.
I guess it is a matter of how these operations are applied, in the right moment in time. So it is all about timing. Maybe that is what intelligence is: applying proper timing in the correct moment. But how do we determine "correct" sometimes this term becomes so elusive that its entire meaning disappears. Correct [I guess] is based on understanding the situation in that moment in time, and making the best course of action. But how do we know what course of action is "the best" ???
Perhaps the best action can be determined by what we feel is true in sincerity at that moment in time, and prior to how well we understand the situation, and if it feels right to us. Maybe this is the true meaning of intelligence??
This is not an exact science, or deduction, but a idea/philosophy to describe the base of a question. Just what is intelligence. I will be updating on this blog in the future, when I have the need to go in more depths. Thank You!
How would the main operators of logic be applied? AND is usually a conjunction operation, dealing with the consistency of multiple values, then getting a more consistent result. AND denoted by ^ is a minor premise tool, where it does reflect unity, but is still based on the idea of reduction, in regards to the opposing assertion.
Then there is OR which is based on the grounds of thorough examination, between this or that. It is like the buffer or between the choice, due to the situation. "Do ya like cheese Burgers" OR "Cheese Pizza" of course I can love cheese burgers, and Pizza, but that depends on the situation. Let say I was having too much citrate, so the pizza sauce could cause its adverse effects, but another time I was consuming too much grease, so burgers could cause some nausea. I guess it is all a matter of the timing, and my previous choices through the moment in time, and what choices I made that are still with me, this determines the correct OR operation. The OR is a choice based on the previous and current progress, and the moment in time, that determines the best result.
Then there is NOT - where is based on simplicity of negation logic -] "the value is whatever the opposite results in" "If he is that good, he is not that bad" The value is determined by what it is not, in opposition. True only when the opposite is false.
I guess it is a matter of how these operations are applied, in the right moment in time. So it is all about timing. Maybe that is what intelligence is: applying proper timing in the correct moment. But how do we determine "correct" sometimes this term becomes so elusive that its entire meaning disappears. Correct [I guess] is based on understanding the situation in that moment in time, and making the best course of action. But how do we know what course of action is "the best" ???
Perhaps the best action can be determined by what we feel is true in sincerity at that moment in time, and prior to how well we understand the situation, and if it feels right to us. Maybe this is the true meaning of intelligence??
This is not an exact science, or deduction, but a idea/philosophy to describe the base of a question. Just what is intelligence. I will be updating on this blog in the future, when I have the need to go in more depths. Thank You!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)